Program Files X86 Environment Rating: 3,9/5 5469votes
Program Files X86 Amazon AssistantProgram Files X86 Download

The answer (checked as right) provided by romka is simple and elegant, but does unfortunately not work (at least on Windows 7 and Windows 8 64 bits, I didn't push my test further). Adobe Acrobat Ocr Language Arabic. The problem comes from the fact that the system%PATH% variable does not always expand other env variable: it works with%SYSTEMDRIVE% for example, but unfortunately not for%PROGRAMFILES%. Suggests that this behavior comes from the level of indirection (%SYSTEMDRIVE% does not refer to a third env variable).

Numark Mixtrack Pro Traktor For Windows. Complete List of Windows 10 Environmental Variables Information Environment. Complete List of Environment Variables in Windows 10. Program Files (x86). ProgramFiles environment variable points to Program Files directory, which stores all the installed program of Windows and others.

The only solution I found is to use the magic and the directories System32/SysWoW64, as suggested in the comments. To avoid the direct deployment of DLLs in the Windows directory, which is usually hard to maintain, one can deploy instead a softlink to a custom directory (works on Windows Vista and later versions of Windows): • method found here: • how to make a softlink here: By the way, sorry for not commenting directly on the relevant posts: currently not enough reputation on my account to do this. Yes it is absolutely possible. Simply write a three.bat files. The first one should look like this: @echo off if '%1' == ' goto x86 if not '%2' == ' goto usage if /i%1 == x86 goto x86 if /i%1 == ia64 goto ia64 goto usage:x86 if not exist '%~dp0bin x86.bat' goto missing call '%~dp0bin x86.bat' goto:eof:ia64 if not exist '%~dp0bin ia64.bat' goto missing call '%~dp0bin ia64.bat' goto:eof:usage echo Error in script usage. The correct usage is: echo%0 [option] echo where [option] is: x86 ^ ia64 echo: echo For example: echo%0 x86 goto:eof:missing echo The specified configuration type is missing.